CALCRIM No. 640. Deliberations and Completion of Verdict Forms: For Use When Defendant Is Charged With First Degree Murder and Jury Is Given Not Guilty Forms for Each Level of Homicide

Judicial Council of California Criminal Jury Instructions (2024 edition)

Bg1d5

J. CHARGE T O JUR Y

640 . Deliberations and Completion of V erdict Forms: For Use

When Defendant Is Charged With First Degree Murder and Jury Is

Given Not Guilty Forms for Each Level of Homicide

[For each count charging murder ,] (Y/y)ou (have been/will be) given

verdict forms for guilty and not guilty of first degr ee murder (, /and)

[second degree murder] [(, /and)] [voluntary manslaughter] [(, /and)]

[involuntary manslaughter].

Y ou may consider these di f ferent kinds of homicide in whatever order

you wish, but I can accept a verdict of guilty or not guilty of

on second degr ee mur der as a lesser included offense, each form of

manslaughter , voluntary and/or involuntary , on which the jury is instructed>

only if all of you have found the defendant not guilty of first degree

murder , [and I can accept a verdict of guilty or not guilty of (voluntary/

involuntary/voluntary or involuntary) manslaughter only if all of you

have found the defendant not guilty of both first and second degree

[As with all of the charges in this case,] (T o/to) return a verdict of guilty

or not guilty on a count, you must all agr ee on that decision.

Follow these directions befor e you give me any completed and signed

final verdict form[s]. [Return the unused verdict form[s] to me,

1. If all of you agree that the People have proved beyond a

reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of first degree

murder, complete and sign that verdict form. Do not complete or

sign any other verdict forms [for that count].

2. If all of you cannot agree whether the defendant is guilty of first

degree murder, inform me that you cannot reach an agreement

and do not complete or sign any verdict forms [for that count].

2. < In addition to paragraphs 1-2, give the following if the jury is

instructed on second degree murder as a lesser included offense. >

[3. If all of you agree that the defendant is not guilty of first degree

murder but also agree that the defendant is guilty of second

degree murder, complete and sign the form for not guilty of first

degree murder and the form for guilty of second degree murder.

Do not complete or sign any other verdict forms [for that count].

4. If all of you agree that the defendant is not guilty of first degree

Bg1d6

murder but cannot agree whether the defendant is guilty of

second degree murder, complete and sign the form for not guilty

of first degree murder and inform me that you cannot reach

further agreement. Do not complete or sign any other verdict

forms [for that count].]

4. < In addition to paragraphs 1-4, give the following if the jury is

instructed on second degree murder as the only lesser included

[5. If all of you agree that the defendant is not guilty of first degree

murder and not guilty of second degree murder, complete and

sign the verdict forms for not guilty of both. Do not complete or

sign any other verdict forms [for that count].]

[5. < In addition to paragraphs 1-4, give the following if the jury is

instructed on second degree murder and only one form of

manslaughter (voluntary or involuntary) as lesser included offenses. >

[5. If all of you agree that the defendant is not guilty of first degree

murder and not guilty of second degree murder, but also agree

that the defendant is guilty of ( voluntary/involuntary)

manslaughter, complete and sign the forms for not guilty of first

degree murder and not guilty of second degree murder and the

form for guilty of (voluntary/involuntary) manslaughter. Do not

complete or sign any other verdict forms [for that count].

6. If all of you agree that the defendant is not guilty of first degree

murder and not guilty of second degree murder, but cannot agree

whether the defendant is guilty of (voluntary/involuntary)

manslaughter, complete and sign the forms for not guilty of first

degree murder and not guilty of second degree murder and

inform me that you cannot reach further agreement. Do not

complete or sign any other verdict forms [for that count].

7. If all of you agree that the defendant is not guilty of first degree

murder, not guilty of second degree murder, and not guilty of

(voluntary/involuntary) manslaughter, complete and sign the

verdict forms for not guilty of each crime. Do not complete or

sign any other verdict forms [for that count].]

7. < In addition to paragraphs 1-4, give the following if the jury is

instructed on second degree murder and both voluntary and

involuntary manslaughter as lesser included offenses.>

[5. If all of you agree that the defendant is not guilty of first degree

murder and not guilty of second degree murder, complete and

sign the forms for not guilty of first degree murder and not guilty

of second degree murder.

CALCRIM No. 640 HOMICIDE

Bg1d7

6. If all of you agree on a verdict of guilty or not guilty of voluntary

or involuntary manslaughter, complete and sign the appropriate

verdict form for each charge on which you agree. You may not

find the defendant guilty of both voluntary and involuntary

manslaughter [as to any count]. Do not complete or sign any

other verdict forms [for that count].

7. If you cannot reach agreement as to voluntary manslaughter or

involuntary manslaughter, inform me of your disagreement. Do

not complete or sign any verdict form for any charge on which

you cannot reach agreement.]

7. < In addition to paragraphs 1-2, give the following if the jury is not

instructed on second degree murder and the jury is instructed on one

form of manslaughter (voluntary or involuntary) as the only lesser

included offense.>

[3. If all of you agree that the defendant is not guilty of first degree

murder but also agree that the defendant is guilty of (voluntary/

involuntary) manslaughter, complete and sign the form for not

guilty of first degree murder and the form for guilty of

(voluntary/involuntary) manslaughter. Do not complete or sign

any other verdict forms [for that count].

4. If all of you agree that the defendant is not guilty of first degree

murder but cannot agree whether the defendant is guilty of

(voluntary/involuntary) manslaughter, complete and sign the form

for not guilty of first degree murder and inform me that you

cannot reach further agreement. Do not complete or sign any

other verdict forms [for that count].

5. If all of you agree that the defendant is not guilty of first degree

murder or (voluntary/involuntary) manslaughter, complete and

sign the verdict forms for not guilty of each crime. Do not

complete or sign any other verdict forms [for that count].]

5. < In addition to paragraphs 1-2, give the following if the jury is

instructed on both voluntary and involuntary manslaughter, but not

second degree murder, as lesser included offenses .>

[3. If all of you agree that the defendant is not guilty of first degree

murder, complete and sign the form for not guilty of first degree

4. If all of you agree on a verdict of guilty or not guilty of voluntary

or involuntary manslaughter, complete and sign the appropriate

verdict form for each charge on which you agree. You may not

find the defendant guilty of both voluntary and involuntary

manslaughter [as to any count]. Do not complete or sign any

HOMICIDE CALCRIM No. 640

Bg1d8

other verdict forms [for that count].

5. If you cannot reach agreement as to voluntary manslaughter or

involuntary manslaughter, inform me of your disagreement. Do

not complete or sign any verdict form for any charge on which

you cannot reach agreement.]

New January 2006; Revised April 2008, August 2009

BENCH NOTES

Instructional Duty

In all homicide cases in which the defendant is charged with first degree murder and

one or more lesser of fense is submitted to the jury , the court has a sua sponte duty

to give this instruction or CALCRIM No. 641, Deliberations and Completion of

V er dict Forms: For Use When Defendant Is Char ged W ith First Degree Mur der and

Jury Is Given Only One Not Guilty V er dict Form for Each Count; Not to Be Used

When Both V oluntary and Involuntary Manslaughter Ar e Lesser Included Offenses.

(See People v . A valos (1984) 37 Cal.3d 216, 228 [207 Cal.Rptr . 549, 689 P .2d 121]

[must instruct jury that it must be unanimous as to degree of murder]; People v .

Dixon (1979) 24 Cal.3d 43, 52 [154 Cal.Rptr . 236, 592 P .2d 752] [jury must

determine degree]; People v . Breverman (1998) 19 Cal.4th 142, 162 [77 Cal.Rptr .2d

870, 960 P .2d 1094] [duty to instruct on lesser included of fenses]; People v .

Dewberry (1959) 51 Cal.2d 548, 555-557 [334 P .2d 852] [duty to instruct that if

jury has reasonable doubt of greater of fense must acquit of that charge]; People v .

Fields (1996) 13 Cal.4th 289, 309-310 [52 Cal.Rptr .2d 282, 914 P .2d 832] [duty to

instruct that jury cannot convict of a lesser of fense unless it has concluded that

defendant is not guilty of the greater of fense]; Stone v . Superior Court (1982) 31

Cal.3d 503, 519 [183 Cal.Rptr . 647, 646 P .2d 809] [duty to give jury opportunity to

render a verdict of partial acquittal on a greater of fense], clarified in People v .

Marshall (1996) 13 Cal.4th 799, 826 [55 Cal.Rptr .2d 347, 919 P .2d 1280] [no duty

to inquire about partial acquittal in absence of indication jury may have found

defendant not guilty of greater of fense].)

In Stone v . Superior Court, supra, 31 Cal.3d at p. 519, the Supreme Court suggested

that the trial court provide the jury with verdict forms of guilty/not guilty on each of

the charged and lesser offenses. The court later referred to this “as a judicially

declared rule of criminal procedure.” ( People v . Kurtzman (1988) 46 Cal.3d 322,

329 [250 Cal.Rptr . 244, 758 P .2d 572].) However , this is not a mandatory procedure.

If the court chooses to follow the procedure suggested in Stone, the court may give

this instruction or CALCRIM No. 642, Deliberations and Completion of V er dict

Forms: For Use When Defendant Is Char ged W ith Second Degr ee Mur der and Jury

Is Given Not Guilty Forms for Each Level of Homicide , in place of this instruction.

The court should tell the jury it may not return a guilty verdict on a lesser included

CALCRIM No. 640 HOMICIDE

Bg1d9

of fense unless it has found the defendant not guilty of the greater of fense. ( People v .

Fields, supra, 13 Cal.4th at pp. 310-31 1.) If the jury announces that it is deadlocked

on the greater of fense but, despite the court’ s instructions, has returned a guilty

verdict on the lesser included of fense, the court should again instruct the jury that it

may not convict of the lesser included of fense unless it has found the defendant not

guilty of the greater of fense. ( Ibid. ) The court should direct the jury to reconsider

the “lone verdict of conviction of the lesser included of fense” in light of this

instruction. ( Ibid. ; Pen. Code, § 1 161.) If the jury is deadlocked on the greater

of fense but the court nevertheless records a guilty verdict on the lesser included

of fense and then discharges the jury , retrial on the greater of fense will be barred.

( People v . Fields, supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 307; Pen. Code, § 1023.)

If, after following the procedures required by Fields , the jury declares that it is

deadlocked on the greater of fense, then the prosecution must elect one of the

following options: (1) the prosecutor may request that the court declare a mistrial on

the greater of fense without recording the verdict on the lesser of fense, allowing the

prosecutor to retry the defendant for the greater of fense; or (2) the prosecutor may

ask the court to record the verdict on the lesser of fense and to dismiss the greater

of fense, opting to accept the current conviction rather than retry the defendant on

the greater of fense. ( People v . Fields, supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 311.)

The court may not control the sequence in which the jury considers the various

homicide of fenses. ( People v . Kurtzman, supra, 46 Cal.3d at pp. 330-331.)

Do not give this instruction if felony murder is the only theory for first degree

murder . ( People v . Mendoza (2000) 23 Cal.4th 896, 908-909 [98 Cal.Rptr .2d 431, 4

• Lesser Included Of fenses-Duty to Instruct. Pen. Code, § 1 159; People v .

Br everman (1998) 19 Cal.4th 142, 162 [77 Cal.Rptr .2d 870, 960 P .2d 1094].

• Degree to Be Set by Jury . Pen. Code, § 1 157; People v . A valos (1984) 37 Cal.3d

216, 228 [207 Cal.Rptr . 549, 689 P .2d 121]; People v . Dixon (1979) 24 Cal.3d

43, 52 [154 Cal.Rptr . 236, 592 P .2d 752].

• Reasonable Doubt as to Degree. Pen. Code, § 1097; People v . Morse (1964) 60

Cal.2d 631, 657 [36 Cal.Rptr . 201, 388 P .2d 33]; People v . Dewberry (1959) 51

Cal.2d 548, 555-557 [334 P .2d 852].

• Conviction of Lesser Precludes Re-trial on Greater . Pen. Code, § 1023; People v .

Fields (1996) 13 Cal.4th 289, 309-310 [52 Cal.Rptr .2d 282, 914 P .2d 832];

People v . Kurtzman (1988) 46 Cal.3d 322, 329 [250 Cal.Rptr . 244, 758 P .2d

• Court May Ask Jury to Reconsider Conviction on Lesser Absent Finding on

Greater . Pen. Code, § 1161; People v . Fields (1996) 13 Cal.4th 289, 310 [52

Cal.Rptr .2d 282, 914 P .2d 832].

• Must Permit Partial V erdict of Acquittal on Greater . People v . Marshall (1996)

13 Cal.4th 799, 826 [55 Cal.Rptr .2d 347, 919 P .2d 1280]; Stone v . Superior

HOMICIDE CALCRIM No. 640

Bg1da

Court (1982) 31 Cal.3d 503, 519 [183 Cal.Rptr . 647, 646 P .2d 809].

• Involuntary Manslaughter Not a Lesser Included Of fense of V oluntary

Manslaughter . People v . Orr (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 780, 784-785 [27

Cal.Rptr .2d 553].

SECONDAR Y SOURCES

5 W itkin & Epstein, California Criminal Law (4th ed. 2012) Criminal T rial, § 713.

4 Millman, Sevilla & T arlow , California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 85,

Submission to Jury and V er dict , § 85.20 (Matthew Bender).

6 Millman, Sevilla & T arlow , California Criminal Defense Practice, Ch. 142, Crimes

Against the Person , §§ 142.01[3][e], 142.02[3][c] (Matthew Bender).

CALCRIM No. 640 HOMICIDE

Page last reviewed May 2024

Michael C. Dorf

Cornell Law professor Michael C. Dorf discusses the adoption of “expressive activity policies” by colleges and universities in response to recent campus protests, examining the legal and practical implications of such policies.

Lawyers - Get Listed Now! Get a free directory profile listing